Archive for April, 2012

Situation Vacant

Wednesday, April 25th, 2012

Architecture Graduate or Registered Architect

I have filled this position with the appointment of Duncan Barron a graduate from Victoria University of Wellington. Duncan not only has great computer presentation skills but brings a sense of build-ability to his creative ideas. Many graduates presented great imagery but often with little sense of structure and construction. It is great to think outside the square but it is also important to be able to progress these ideas into physical reality. Equally important as a commercial employer is to progress these ideas into a economic and functional reality.

Duncan also brings in interesting ideas from his thesis on Suburban Infill for Wellington that are equally applicable to all suburban areas of New Zealand; see an extract below;

Since widespread private car ownership became the norm, low density detached housing has become embedded in a New Zealand culture that reveres the traditional suburban home. However, as the population of New Zealand’s major cities continue to grow and experience demographical shifts, it is realised that the current trend in low density detached housing does not provide a sustainable solution to meet our future housing needs. My thesis explored how row housing can be integrated into a suburban context to meet the demographical needs and suburban amenity associated to the traditional detached home. Row housing has provided the needs for dense residential habitation across the world for many centuries. Despite this, row housing is a relatively new form of housing to New Zealand, with very few Wellington developments located in suburbia. Medium density housing developments are becoming increasingly important as an alternative housing type to intensify existing areas and contain the proliferation of suburban sprawl.

With the majority of Wellingtonians choosing to reside in the suburbs, the comparative nature of increased dwelling density in row housing goes against the tradition and ethos of low density detached home ownership. As a result, there is a strong conflict with the integration of row housing, compounded by public resistance and market aversion to this housing type. When considered in context, it is acknowledged that row housing invariably involves a degree of compromise in seeking to identify with local traditions of low density detached housing. Three key interconnected design issues are identified: the accommodation of internal garaging and car access, the relationship between internal living space and outdoor space and the degree of individuality expressed to each house.